Friendship after the romantic ends
· 11 min read
What friendship actually is
Before asking whether ex-friendship is possible, it is worth being clear about what friendship is. Friendship is voluntary, reciprocal, oriented toward each other's flourishing, and stable over time. It is not just contact. It is not just shared history. It is not just absence of hostility. By this definition, many relationships people call friendships with exes do not actually meet the criteria. They are not voluntary, exactly, but rather entangled. They are not oriented toward each other's flourishing, but rather toward managing the residue of the romantic relationship. Naming what friendship actually is clarifies why most ex-friendships are not it.The interim phase
The first year or two after a serious breakup is rarely a time when real friendship can form. Both people are still processing, still adjusting, still working out what their life looks like without the other person. Contact during this period is heavy. Every interaction is freighted with what the relationship was. Fisher's rebuilding framework calls this period the dissolution phase, and his advice is mostly to minimize contact during it, not because contact is wrong but because it impedes the rebuilding. The friendship question, if it is to be answered honestly, has to be asked later, after the dissolution has finished. Asking it during is asking too early.Sexual residue
Sexual attraction does not necessarily disappear when the romantic relationship ends. Two people who were lovers and who are now trying to be friends often discover that the attraction remains, especially if there is alcohol involved, especially if either is between partners. The slip back into sexual contact is common and almost always destabilizing. Real friendship requires that the sexual chapter be genuinely closed. Either both people have actually lost the attraction, or both have the discipline to not act on residual attraction. If neither condition holds, the friendship is unstable, and the instability will eventually produce either resumption of the romantic relationship or a worse final breakup.The new partner test
A reasonable test for whether ex-friendship is healthy is whether it can survive the introduction of new partners. If you cannot tell your new partner the truth about how often you talk to your ex, the friendship is not what you are calling it. If your new partner is uncomfortable with the friendship and you experience their discomfort as unreasonable, examine why. New partners are not always right to be suspicious of ex-friendships, but they are often picking up on something real that the people inside the friendship are not seeing. The test is not whether the new partner approves, but whether the friendship is honest enough that approval is even possible.Asymmetric desire for friendship
When one ex wants friendship and the other does not, the conventional assumption is that the one wanting friendship is more evolved. This assumption is wrong as often as it is right. The one not wanting friendship is sometimes the one who has more accurately assessed that contact will prevent healing. Susan Anderson's work on abandonment grief is relevant: maintained contact with the lost partner can keep the abandonment wound open. The desire for friendship is sometimes a desire not to fully accept the loss. Refusing friendship can be the more honest move, even when it looks like coldness. The framing of the refuser as cold is often a way of avoiding the legitimate reasons for their refusal.Children change the calculation
If you have children together, you do not have a choice about ongoing contact. The question is not whether to remain in contact but what register the contact should be in. Calling it friendship is sometimes accurate, often premature, and occasionally a misnomer for something more functional. Co-parenting relationships can be civil and cooperative without being friendships. The pressure to call them friendships is sometimes useful, sometimes harmful. The honest framing is that you are ongoing operational partners in raising your children, and that friendship may or may not develop separately, on its own timeline.The mutual friends problem
Most long relationships produce shared friend groups, and the breakup forces these groups to either fragment or maintain awkward neutrality. The pressure to remain friendly with your ex is partly about preserving the shared social infrastructure. This is a real consideration, but it is also a place where ex-friendship can become coerced. You stay friendly to keep the dinner parties working. The dinner parties may or may not be worth it. Sometimes the honest move is to let the social network fragment, accept that some friends will keep your ex and others will keep you, and form new networks. The pressure to preserve the existing network is not always worth the cost of fake friendship.Time as the real variable
The most reliable predictor of whether ex-friendship is possible is how much time has passed. Fisher's research on post-divorce adjustment suggests that meaningful re-engagement, if it is to happen, typically becomes possible somewhere between two and five years after the end. Before that window, attempts at friendship usually fail or produce confusion. After it, if both people have done their own work and built independent lives, organic friendship can emerge. The friendship that emerges at year five is qualitatively different from the contact at year one. Confusing the two is a category error. Time is doing real work in the background.What grows from completed grief
The version of ex-friendship that works is built on completed grief. Both people have fully grieved the loss of the romantic relationship and have stopped wanting it back. From that ground, a different relationship can grow, one that is genuinely friendship and not residual attachment. Anderson's framework for abandonment recovery describes the endpoint as one in which the lost person becomes part of your history rather than part of your present need. When that shift has happened on both sides, friendship is possible because it is not standing in for something else. Before that shift, the friendship is always carrying weight it cannot bear.When friendship is not the goal
A common confusion is treating friendship as the obvious goal of any ending, the test of whether you have done it well. This is not necessarily true. The goal of an ending is for both people to be whole and free. Friendship is one possible outcome of that goal. Polite acquaintance is another. Mutual no-contact is another. None of these is intrinsically superior. The cliché says friendship is the achievement, but the achievement is the wholeness, not the relationship form. Some endings produce friendship. Others produce respectful distance. The shape of the outcome should follow from the specifics, not from a presupposed answer.The friendship you keep is not the relationship you had
If friendship does emerge, it is not the relationship you had. It is a new relationship between two people who used to be in a different relationship. Trying to preserve the old relationship inside the new one is one of the most common failures. The new friendship has to be permitted to be different. You do not have the same access, the same intimacy, the same priority claims. The new friendship is smaller, more bounded, and that is what makes it possible. Trying to keep all the old privileges of the romantic relationship within the new friendship is what causes the new friendship to collapse. Smaller is sustainable. Bigger is not.Letting it be what it is
The deepest version of the practice is letting the post-relationship shape be what it is, rather than what you think it should be. Some endings produce decades of warm friendship. Some produce a single conversation a year. Some produce nothing, by mutual agreement, and that is also fine. The cultural script that friendship is the right outcome forces people into shapes that do not fit. The honest practice is to notice what shape is actually emerging and to inhabit it without trying to force it to be something else. Friendship after the romantic ends is possible. So is its absence. Both can be done well. Both can be done badly. The choice is not whether to be friends. The choice is whether to be honest about what is actually possible between you, and to live in that.Citations
1. Fisher, Bruce, and Robert Alberti. Rebuilding: When Your Relationship Ends. 4th ed. Atascadero, CA: Impact Publishers, 2016. 2. Anderson, Susan. The Journey from Abandonment to Healing. New York: Berkley Books, 2000. 3. Ahrons, Constance R. The Good Divorce: Keeping Your Family Together When Your Marriage Comes Apart. New York: HarperCollins, 1994. 4. Thomas, Katherine Woodward. Conscious Uncoupling: 5 Steps to Living Happily Even After. New York: Harmony Books, 2015. 5. Kayser, Karen. When Love Dies: The Process of Marital Disaffection. New York: Guilford Press, 1993. 6. Hetherington, E. Mavis, and John Kelly. For Better or for Worse: Divorce Reconsidered. New York: W. W. Norton, 2002. 7. Coontz, Stephanie. Marriage, a History: How Love Conquered Marriage. New York: Penguin Books, 2006. 8. Cherlin, Andrew J. The Marriage-Go-Round: The State of Marriage and the Family in America Today. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2009. 9. Emery, Robert E. The Truth About Children and Divorce: Dealing with the Emotions So You and Your Children Can Thrive. New York: Viking, 2004. 10. Kelly, Joan B., and Robert E. Emery. "Children's Adjustment Following Divorce: Risk and Resilience Perspectives." Family Relations 52, no. 4 (October 2003): 352-362. 11. Sassler, Sharon, and Amanda Miller. Cohabitation Nation: Gender, Class, and the Remaking of Relationships. Oakland: University of California Press, 2017. 12. Marquardt, Elizabeth. Between Two Worlds: The Inner Lives of Children of Divorce. New York: Crown Publishers, 2005.
◆
Cite this:
Comments
·
Sign in to join the conversation.
Be the first to share how this landed.