Stoic parenting — what Marcus Aurelius wrote to his son

· 11 min read

The Commodus problem

Marcus Aurelius's son Commodus succeeded him in 180 CE and became a byword for imperial dysfunction. He neglected administration, fought as a gladiator, declared himself Hercules reborn, and was eventually strangled in his bath by a wrestler. The historical question — could Marcus have raised him differently — is unanswerable, but the philosophical question is not. Stoicism does not claim to guarantee outcomes. It claims to govern the parent's conduct. A parenting philosophy that promised Commodus-proofing would be lying. Stoicism's refusal to make that promise is one of its honesties. The Commodus problem is therefore not a refutation of Stoic parenting; it is a stress test that the philosophy survives because the philosophy never overpromised.

Book I as parenting inventory

Marcus opens Meditations with twelve sections cataloging what he received from specific people. The catalog is concrete: from one, the example of refusing to take sides at the chariot races; from another, the practice of not being driven by displays of affection from friends; from another, the discipline of writing one's own letters rather than dictating; from another, tolerance of disagreement without rancor. The granularity matters. Marcus is not thanking these adults for "values" in the abstract; he is thanking them for specific observable behaviors that he absorbed by proximity. A parent reading Book I and asking "what would my children list" is doing the basic Stoic parental audit.

Antoninus Pius and the model of moderate command

Marcus's adoptive father, the emperor Antoninus Pius, gets the longest and most loving entry. Marcus lists: mildness, unshakable resolve once a decision had been reached, lack of vainglory, attentive listening, refusal of flattery, ability to put down a book when work called and take it up again when leisure permitted, plain meals, modest clothing, willingness to give credit to those with real expertise. This is the portrait of a head of state who carried power without being deformed by it. Marcus is saying: this is the adult I am trying to become, and this is the adult any child should have nearby. The portrait is unstrained — no theatrics, no fireworks — and that is the point. Children are not raised by spectacular adults; they are raised by adults who can be relied upon over decades.

The dichotomy of control

Epictetus, whom Marcus studied via Rusticus's gift of his notebooks, opens the Enchiridion with the dichotomy: some things are in our power, some are not. In our power: opinion, pursuit, desire, aversion — in short, our own acts. Not in our power: body, property, reputation, command — in short, anything not our own act. Applied to parenting, this is severe. The child's body, temperament, choices, and eventual life are not the parent's own acts. They are the child's. The parent's own acts — how the parent attends, speaks, decides, models — are the parent's. Parents who cannot accept this division spend their lives trying to control what they cannot control and neglecting what they can.

Premeditatio malorum at the kitchen table

The exercise is straightforward and most parents avoid it: sit quietly and imagine, in concrete detail, the worst plausible misfortunes — your child seriously ill, your child estranged, your child's death. The point is not to suffer the imagined event but to register that the present moment, in which the child is whole and present, is contingent and precious. Parents who do this exercise periodically report a sharpening of attention to the child in front of them and a softening of the trivial grievances that otherwise dominate family life. The exercise is also moral preparation: if the misfortune arrives, the parent has already rehearsed the territory.

View from above

Marcus repeatedly uses the kataskopia, the view from above — imagining the human scene from such a height that individual ambitions, vanities, and grievances become small. For a parent, this is a regulating exercise. The fight about screen time, the panic about the school admission, the comparison to the neighbor's child — viewed from above, these collapse. What remains visible from height is whether the child is loved, whether the household is stable, whether the parent is present. The exercise does not minimize parenting; it correctly sizes the dramas inside parenting so that they do not consume the relationship.

The role of prohairesis

Prohairesis — the faculty of choice, the moral will — is the Stoic name for the seat of human dignity. It is the one thing entirely up to a person. A child has their own prohairesis from very early on, and the Stoic parent recognizes this and respects it. The child is not a substance to be shaped but a person with their own ruling faculty, which the parent can address, instruct, and model for, but not override. This is why Stoic parenting rejects manipulation and coercive control. To override another's prohairesis is to deny their humanity, even when the other is your child.

Hadot on philosophy as way of life

Pierre Hadot's recovery of ancient philosophy as a way of life rather than a body of doctrine matters here. Stoicism was not a set of propositions to be memorized; it was a set of askēsis, spiritual exercises, to be practiced daily. Parenting in this frame is itself a sustained spiritual exercise. The morning preparation, the evening review, the meditation on impermanence, the practice of right speech — these are not adjacent to parenting; they are the form parenting takes. A Stoic parent is one who treats the parenting day as an exercise field for the ruling faculty.

The evening review

Seneca describes ending each day by reviewing it before sleep: what did I do well, what did I do poorly, what will I change. Applied to parenting, this is a quiet five-minute audit. Where did I lose my temper? Where did I attend? Where did I model what I want to transmit? The review is not flagellation; it is calibration. Parents who do this consistently report that the gradient of improvement is real and that the children register it without it being announced. The review converts each day's parenting into data for the next.

Pigliucci's modern translation

Massimo Pigliucci's contribution is to make Stoic practice accessible to contemporary readers without the imperial trappings. He frames the dichotomy of control as a practical filter for daily anxiety: when something occupies your mind, ask whether it is up to you; if yes, act; if no, release. For parents, this filter is high-yield. Most parental rumination is about things outside the parent's control. Pigliucci's translation makes the ancient exercise usable on a Tuesday morning during the school run.

What Stoic parenting refuses

It refuses the parental fantasy of total control. It refuses the outcome contract. It refuses theatrical displays of either love or discipline. It refuses the consumption-based substitutes for presence — the toys, the trips, the credentials — that stand in for the parent's actual attention. It refuses the modern habit of treating the child as a project. It refuses the ancient habit of treating the child as property. It carves out a middle: the child as a fellow rational being, younger, still developing, owed instruction and example and respect for their own prohairesis.

Friendship as the long-term frame

Marcus, citing Antoninus, notes the value of being able to enjoy one's friends without needing them and to be without them without feeling their absence. Applied to parenting, this points to the long arc: the eventual transition of the parent-child relation into something closer to friendship between adults. A Stoic parent prepares from the beginning for this transition, neither clinging to the dependent stage nor rushing the child out of it. The frame ages well because it is designed for the full life span of the relationship, not only the high-intensity years.

The collective effect

A culture parenting in Stoic mode would be quieter. Less performance, less anxiety, less display. More observable conduct, more attention to the parent's own conduct, more acceptance of what cannot be controlled and more rigor about what can. Children raised in such a culture would be more stable under pressure because the adults around them were more stable. The Commodus risk does not go away — no parenting culture eliminates it — but the median outcome shifts. This is what philosophy at the collective scale offers: not guarantees, but better odds, achieved through the slow accumulation of better-conducted adults.

Citations

1. Marcus Aurelius. Meditations. Translated by Gregory Hays. New York: Modern Library, 2002. 2. Marcus Aurelius. Meditations. Translated by Martin Hammond. London: Penguin Classics, 2006. 3. Hadot, Pierre. The Inner Citadel: The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. Translated by Michael Chase. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998. 4. Hadot, Pierre. Philosophy as a Way of Life. Edited by Arnold I. Davidson. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995. 5. Pigliucci, Massimo. How to Be a Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life. New York: Basic Books, 2017. 6. Epictetus. The Discourses and Enchiridion. Translated by W. A. Oldfather. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, 1925. 7. Seneca. Letters on Ethics to Lucilius. Translated by Margaret Graver and A. A. Long. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015. 8. Long, A. A. Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 9. Birley, Anthony R. Marcus Aurelius: A Biography. Rev. ed. London: Routledge, 2000. 10. Pigliucci, Massimo, and Gregory Lopez. A Handbook for New Stoics: How to Thrive in a World Out of Your Control. New York: The Experiment, 2019. 11. Robertson, Donald. How to Think Like a Roman Emperor: The Stoic Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2019. 12. Sellars, John. The Art of Living: The Stoics on the Nature and Function of Philosophy. London: Bristol Classical Press, 2009.

◆

Cite this:

View edit history

← PreviousBuddhist parenting — non-attachment and presence Continue →Jewish parenting — questions over answers

Comments

Be the first to share how this landed.