Humanist confirmation and the rites secular families build

Human-Etisk Forbund's borgerlig konfirmasjon began in 1951 with a handful of young people and now annually involves around twenty per cent of Norway's fifteen-year-olds — more than the Lutheran church's confirmation in many cities. The preparation course covers ethics, human rights, critical thinking, sexuality, drugs, racism, and questions of meaning. The ceremony is held in town halls and concert venues, with speeches by humanist representatives, music, and the formal recognition of each young person. The Norwegian experience demonstrates that a secular ritual can become a normal, even default, cultural option when an organisation invests sustained effort over decades. The institution matters; ad-hoc family rituals do not scale or transmit without it.

The German Jugendweihe has a more complicated history because it was co-opted by the GDR as a state-sponsored secular rite of passage with political overtones. After reunification, it had to be reclaimed and reinvented by humanist organisations, and the contested history is still part of how it is received. This is instructive: secular rites are not immune to political capture, and the institutions running them have to be vigilant about what content they are transmitting. A coming-of-age rite can be made to serve a regime as easily as a religion, and the protection against this is the same in both cases — robust, plural, accountable institutions rather than centralised state or corporate sponsorship.

Sherwin Wine's founding of Humanistic Judaism in 1963 was one of the most thoughtful attempts to build a fully secular religious tradition. His insight was that Judaism could be sustained as a culture, a history, a moral tradition, and a community without theological premises — that the bar mitzvah ceremony, the festival cycle, and the lifecycle rites could be retained with their content rewritten. His critics from more traditional Jewish positions argued that this was a contradiction; his defenders argued that it was the natural continuation of a tradition that had always been internally diverse. Whatever the merits of that argument, the practical outcome was a working liturgy and a working set of rites that other secular traditions have learned from.

The convergence of confirmation rites around age fourteen or fifteen across cultures and centuries is not arbitrary. This is the age at which the cognitive shift to abstract moral reasoning is largely complete, sexual maturity is well underway, and the developmental task of beginning to differentiate from the family of origin is becoming urgent. A rite at this age recognises something the child themselves is feeling but cannot yet articulate. Rites earlier than this — at seven, say — work as preparatory markers; rites later than this — at eighteen, as some humanist groups have tried — tend to feel too late, after the developmental work has already happened informally. The traditional timing seems to be tracking something real about adolescent development.

The ceremony is the visible part, but the preparation period is where the real work happens. Norwegian humanist confirmation involves several months of weekly classes; American secular bar mitzvah preparation may involve a year of mentorship; family-invented rites often include an extended project the young person completes. This preparation is itself the rite of passage; the ceremony is the public acknowledgement that the preparation has occurred. Secular families who try to short-cut by holding the ceremony without the preparation find that the ceremony feels hollow. The function of the rite is in the work, not in the moment.

One of the under-recognised features of confirmation rites is that they require, and bring forth, adults other than parents to take an active interest in the young person's formation. In humanist confirmation programmes, the course leaders are typically not the parents; in traditional confirmation, the priest or rabbi plays this role; in family-invented rites, parents often deliberately recruit aunts, uncles, family friends to be present and to speak. This is significant because the developmental task at fourteen includes beginning to receive adult identity from sources outside the family. Children who have only their parents as adult models have nowhere to grow into except within or against the parents. Rites that involve other adults open the door to identification beyond the family, which is part of becoming adult.

Many secular families do not have access to humanist confirmation organisations and invent their own rites. The variation is enormous: solo wilderness experiences modelled on indigenous traditions, a year of weekly conversations between the young person and one chosen adult mentor, the writing of a personal manifesto read at a family gathering, a long bicycle trip, the completion of a meaningful service project. These invented rites can work, but they require more parental effort than institutional ones, and they often lack the social weight that comes from being recognised by a wider community. The trade-off is freedom versus weight; the right choice depends on what the family has access to.

What the confirmation rite is to fifteen, the wedding rite is to thirty. Secular weddings have evolved much faster than secular confirmations, partly because the cultural pressure is higher and partly because the legal infrastructure was already in place. The richness or thinness of a wedding ritual transmits to the children who will eventually be raised by that couple, because rituals are how families learn what occasions deserve weight. Couples who have a thoughtful, communally witnessed wedding tend to build thoughtful, communally witnessed rituals around their children's milestones. Couples whose wedding was a transactional courthouse signing tend to mark their children's transitions thinly as well. The rituals of one generation become the parenting infrastructure of the next.

If confirmation rites are the easier end of the secular ritual challenge, death rites are the harder. Death exposes the metaphysical bare bones of a worldview. Religious traditions have well-worked-out death rites that do real psychological work for the bereaved; secular traditions are still catching up. Secular funerals can be done well — a focus on the person's actual life, the gathering of community, the giving of testimony, the marking of the body's passage — but they require more deliberate construction than secular weddings, and many secular families default to thin funeral rites because they have not built the institutional knowledge. This is a frontier where the humanist organisations are doing important work, but the work is far from complete.

A rite of passage is doing several things at once. It is telling the young person, "your community sees that you are changing." It is telling the parents, "your role is changing; you are no longer in command." It is telling the wider community, "this young person is now to be addressed differently than before." It is installing in the young person a memory they can draw on later when they need to remember who they said they would be. These functions are not specifically religious. They are anthropological. Any rite that delivers them well will work; any rite that fails to deliver them, however elaborate, will not. Secular rites stand or fall on whether they actually do this work.

A failure mode of secular rite-building is that the ceremony becomes a performance — Instagrammable, well-catered, aesthetically considered, but without the underlying formation that makes the ceremony mean anything. This is the secular version of the same failure that afflicts religious rites that have become routine. The fix is the same in both cases: insist on the preparation work, insist on real reflection, insist that the young person actually has something to say rather than just standing up while others say things about them. The rite is the visible tip of a process; if the process is missing, the rite is theatre.

The deeper question for the humanist confirmation movement is whether the rites stick across generations — whether the child who passes through humanist confirmation will, in turn, send their own child through it. Early evidence from Norway and Germany suggests yes, with some attrition. The rites are becoming family traditions, not just one-time experiments. The American situation is harder to read, but the parallel rise of secular wedding officiants, secular funeral celebrants, and humanist organisations suggests the infrastructure is thickening. The collective task is to maintain quality as the rites scale, because the moment a rite becomes routine it loses the function it was created to serve. The institutions that have done this best — Norwegian humanism, humanistic Judaism — have done so by continuing to take the substantive preparation seriously, generation after generation, even as the ceremony becomes more familiar.

1. Wine, Sherwin T. Judaism Beyond God: A Radical New Way to Be Jewish. Farmington Hills, MI: Society for Humanistic Judaism, 1985. 2. Wine, Sherwin T. Staying Sane in a Crazy World: A Guide to Rational Living. Birmingham, MI: Center for New Thinking, 1995. 3. Zuckerman, Phil. Living the Secular Life: New Answers to Old Questions. New York: Penguin Press, 2014. 4. Zuckerman, Phil. Society without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us About Contentment. New York: New York University Press, 2008. 5. Sagan, Sasha. For Small Creatures Such as We: Rituals for Finding Meaning in Our Unlikely World. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 2019. 6. Bell, Catherine. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. 7. Turner, Victor. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine, 1969. 8. Van Gennep, Arnold. The Rites of Passage. Translated by Monika B. Vizedom and Gabrielle L. Caffee. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960. 9. Grimes, Ronald L. Deeply into the Bone: Re-Inventing Rites of Passage. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000. 10. Cimino, Richard, and Christopher Smith. Atheist Awakening: Secular Activism and Community in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. 11. Lee, Lois. Recognizing the Non-Religious: Reimagining the Secular. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 12. Engelke, Matthew. "Christianity and the Anthropology of Secular Humanism." Current Anthropology 55, no. S10 (2014): S292–S301.