Public pools, parks, and the third places kids need

Ray Oldenburg's 1989 The Great Good Place described the third place as informal, accessible, conversational, and host to "regulars" — the café, the pub, the barbershop. He was writing about adults, but the structure transfers to children with a few modifications. The childhood third place is more physical and less verbal. It is the pool, the playground, the rec-center gym, the library after school, the corner of the park where the older kids skateboard. The "regulars" are kids who show up enough that the staff knows their names. The "conversation" is play. The function is the same: a place that is not home, not school, not a scheduled activity, where social life can happen at the speed of presence rather than appointment.

Between 1933 and the early 1940s, the WPA and PWA built or rebuilt roughly 750 public swimming pools in the United States, many of them enormous — the Astoria Pool in Queens, the Fairground Park Pool in St. Louis, Sara Roosevelt Pool on the Lower East Side. These were not lap pools. They were aquatic plazas designed to hold thousands of bodies at once, with bleachers and bathhouses and grand entries. The scale was not accidental. The era's planners understood the pool as civic infrastructure on the order of a library or a courthouse, and they built accordingly. Nothing on that scale has been built in the United States in the last sixty years.

Jeff Wiltse's Contested Waters tracks what happened to that infrastructure after the integration of municipal pools in the late 1940s and 1950s. The pattern was consistent across cities: court-ordered or politically negotiated integration, immediate white flight from the pool, declining attendance, deferred maintenance, eventual closure, and the rise of the private backyard pool and the membership swim club. The pool was not abandoned because Americans stopped wanting to swim. It was abandoned because white Americans stopped wanting to swim with Black Americans, and the public infrastructure could not survive the withdrawal of the tax-paying customer base. The story is uglier than the nostalgia industry around old pools admits.

The postwar backyard pool — six million of them in the U.S. by the 2010s — is the architectural fossil of the exit from public swimming. A backyard pool is a strange object: expensive to install, expensive to maintain, used for a few weeks a year by a single family, and unsafe in well-documented ways. It exists not because it is the best technology for child swimming, which it isn't, but because it solved a social problem: how does a family swim without sharing water with strangers. The technology is private property; the problem it solves is segregation; the cost is borne in part by the children who never learn to swim because their families don't have a backyard.

The CDC's drowning data is a precise X-ray of pool-access inequality. Black children drown at roughly 1.5 times the rate of white children overall, and at five to ten times the rate in swimming-pool drownings specifically, depending on age cohort. The proximate cause is that a much smaller fraction of Black children learn to swim. The distal cause is the collapse of the public pool, which was where prior generations learned. This is not a metaphor or a hand-wavy correlation. Children die at measurable rates because a city closed its pool, and the deaths cluster by race in ways that map onto the integration-era closures.

Where pools have collapsed, parks have absorbed some of the third-place function by default, but parks do different work. A park has no controlled entry, no staff (usually), and no built-in activity. It functions well for families who arrive with their own social capital — a group of neighborhood kids who already know each other, a parent who can stay — and badly for kids who would have to make friends on the spot. The park rewards the already-connected and is unhelpful to the disconnected. Pools, with their lifeguards and regulars and forced proximity, did the opposite. The two are complements, not substitutes, and replacing pools with parks-only is a downgrade.

A pool is not a pool without lifeguards. A park is not a park without rec-league coaches, summer staff, and someone to unlock the bathroom. The capital cost of public-space infrastructure is one-time and visible; the operating cost is permanent and invisible, and political systems are systematically bad at the latter. A new park gets built with a federal grant; ten years later the city has no money to mow it. The grant cycle and the operating cycle are mismatched, and the mismatch produces the characteristic American pattern of fancy new facilities that don't work because nobody is paid to make them work.

In many American cities, the public library has become the de facto childhood third place — air-conditioned, supervised, free, with bathrooms and books and increasingly with maker-spaces and after-school programs. Librarians did not sign up for this role, and the funding hasn't followed the function, but the library is doing the work that pools and rec centers used to do. The cost of this is borne by library staff (who are doing social work on librarian wages) and by the kids who would benefit from a more physical third place than a reading room. The library is wonderful and overloaded. It cannot be the only answer.

The suburban version of the pool problem is the homeowners-association swim club: a membership pool, often built into a development's amenities, accessible only to residents and their guests. These work fine for the kids who live there. They function as soft exclusion at the property line, and they consume the political constituency that might otherwise advocate for municipal swimming. A family that pays HOA dues for a pool will not also vote to fund a city pool. The privatization is not just architectural; it is constituency-draining, and the drained constituency is why public pools struggle even in cities that could afford them.

Public-space advocates sometimes treat free as the whole of the policy. It isn't. A free park that requires a long walk through a hostile street, with no shade, no bathroom, and no adult presence, is functionally inaccessible to a 9-year-old whose mother is at work. Visibility matters: can a parent see the place from the apartment window? Is there a clear safe route on foot? Are there other families there at the times children would use it? These are design questions, and they are routinely fumbled by parks departments that think their job ended when they put down the grass.

One of the great quiet losses of modern childhood is age-mixing — the routine presence of older and younger children in the same unsupervised space. School sorts by age. Organized sports sort by age. Camps mostly sort by age. The third place is one of the few remaining contexts where a six-year-old can watch an eleven-year-old and learn how to be eleven, and an eleven-year-old can watch a six-year-old and learn how to be patient. Pools and parks, when they work, are age-mixed by default. Their decline has accelerated the age-sorting of childhood, with consequences for how children learn the social hierarchy they will live in for the rest of their lives.

Why have American cities not rebuilt their pools? The simple answer is money, but cities find money for stadiums, convention centers, and downtown plazas. The deeper answer is constituency. A pool serves children and the families of children, weighted toward the working class and the poor; these constituencies do not show up at city council meetings, do not write checks to campaigns, and do not have lobbyists. A stadium serves a billionaire and a fan base that includes large corporate sponsors; the constituency is small but organized. The pool loses every time, and the cumulative result is a built environment in which it is easier to attend a football game than to teach your child to swim.

Klinenberg's argument that physical social infrastructure produces social outcomes is empirically defensible and politically inconvenient, because it implies that the cure for atomization is concrete. A serious national rebuild of childhood third-place infrastructure — a pool in every neighborhood that lost one, a staffed rec center in every district, year-round programming in every park — would cost on the order of 50 to 100 billion dollars in capital and a few billion a year in operations, spread across decades. By federal-budget standards this is small. By municipal-budget standards it is impossible without state and federal partnership. The political coalition to demand the partnership does not yet exist. Building it is part of what Law 4 means.

1. Oldenburg, Ray. The Great Good Place. New York: Marlowe & Company, 1989. 2. Wiltse, Jeff. Contested Waters: A Social History of Swimming Pools in America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2007. 3. Klinenberg, Eric. Palaces for the People: How Social Infrastructure Can Help Fight Inequality, Polarization, and the Decline of Civic Life. New York: Crown, 2018. 4. Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000. 5. Putnam, Robert D. Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2015. 6. Wuthnow, Robert. Loose Connections: Joining Together in America's Fragmented Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998. 7. Paris, Leslie. Children's Nature: The Rise of the American Summer Camp. New York: New York University Press, 2008. 8. Van Slyck, Abigail A. A Manufactured Wilderness: Summer Camps and the Shaping of American Youth, 1890–1960. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006. 9. Mechling, Jay. On My Honor: Boy Scouts and the Making of American Youth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001. 10. Macleod, David I. Building Character in the American Boy: The Boy Scouts, YMCA, and Their Forerunners, 1870–1920. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983. 11. Smith, Christian, and Melinda Lundquist Denton. Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. 12. Zuckerman, Phil. Living the Secular Life: New Answers to Old Questions. New York: Penguin Press, 2014.