Other adults your child needs (and so do you)

Human infants develop multiple attachment representations in parallel. Strange Situation research extended to non-maternal caregivers shows children form distinct, durable attachments to fathers, grandparents, regular childcare providers, and other consistent adults. Each attachment is encoded in a separate internal working model; they are not redundant copies of the maternal attachment but distinct neural patterns. This is adaptive: a child with multiple secure attachments has more developed prefrontal regulatory capacity, more diversified stress response options, and a wider repertoire of social behaviors. Cortisol regulation studies in daycare contexts show that children with secure attachments to their teachers, in addition to parents, fare better than those without, even with equally secure parental attachment.

The mechanism is what Hrdy calls "shared intersubjectivity." A child who is held by multiple minds gets to be a multifaceted person. They learn that different aspects of themselves can be brought forward with different adults — the silly aspect with one, the serious with another, the brave with a third — and that this is not fragmentation but range. This expands the self. Children with only one or two adult mirrors develop narrower self-concepts, which become rigid in adolescence and limiting in adulthood. The other-adult also breaks projective identification cycles: when a parent is unconsciously placing a role on their child (the lost sibling, the failed marriage, the future redemption), an outside adult can see the child as not that role and reflect them as separate.

Infancy: the alloparents are physically present caregivers — grandparents who change diapers, friends who hold the baby while you shower. Toddlerhood: alloparents become play partners and limit-setters in their own right. Childhood: alloparents become mentors, witnesses to specific skills, sources of knowledge the parent does not have. Adolescence: alloparents become the trusted adult the teenager goes to when they cannot go to the parent — and this is essential; an adolescent without such an adult is at significantly elevated risk for self-harm and isolation. Emerging adulthood: alloparents become advisors, references, and the soft landing the parent cannot fully provide because of the developmental need for differentiation.

The godparent in Catholic and Orthodox traditions; the compadrazgo system in Latin America; the play-cousin in African American kinship; the auntie network in Pacific Islander cultures; the kibbutz metapelet; the namesake relationships in Pacific Northwest Indigenous communities; the mentor in Jewish and bar/bat mitzvah traditions. Across cultures, the role is named, ritualized, and given specific responsibilities. The Western secular default, which has no name and no ritual for the role, is the outlier. Parents in non-traditional contexts often have to invent the structure that other cultures inherit.

Identify three to seven candidate adults. Name them in your head as roles, not just relationships. Invite them into your child's life in specific ways — a monthly outing, bedtime stories over video call, a yearly tradition. Give them real authority; ask them to set limits, to advise, to give gifts that reflect who they are, not who you wish your child to be. Do not over-coordinate their relationship with your child; let it develop in its own direction. Mark the role explicitly — a small ceremony, a letter, a regular dinner. Do not assume they know they matter; tell them. When they make decisions you'd make differently, tolerate it, unless it is a safety issue. When your child confides in them rather than you, be glad, not threatened.

The relationship between the parent and the alloparent is a relationship in its own right that requires its own maintenance. You cannot drop a child off and expect the bond to thrive without the adult-to-adult connection underpinning it. The grandparent who matters is one whose relationship with you is functional. The friend who becomes an auntie is one whose friendship you have invested in. The dynamics get complex when there is conflict between parent and alloparent over values, methods, or limits. Negotiating these conflicts respectfully — not by silencing the alloparent, not by deferring entirely, but by treating them as a co-stakeholder — is part of the work.

The premise that the child is the property of the parent, that parental authority is total, that outside adult influence is intrusion — this is a particular cultural inheritance, sharpened by Lockean liberalism and Western legal traditions of patriapotestas. Cooperative-breeding societies hold a different premise: that the child belongs to the community and is on temporary loan to the biological parents. Neither extreme is fully correct. The workable middle is that the child is their own person, with attachments and loyalties that the parent does not own, embedded in a community that has legitimate stake in their flourishing.

Wet nursing, fosterage, apprenticeship, the medieval practice of sending children to other households for socialization, the colonial-era practice of binding out children to learn trades, the nineteenth-century shift to keeping children at home, the twentieth-century isolation of the nuclear family — these chart a long history of children moving between adults and households. The twentieth-century arrangement is the historical exception, not the rule. The current "intensive parenting" model that loads everything onto two people peaked in the 1990s-2010s and is showing measurable strain.

Safety. The reason many parents over-restrict their child's exposure to other adults is the real and documented risk of abuse, primarily from known adults. The response is not isolation but discernment — building trust over time, maintaining the child's open communication with you, watching for warning signs, and trusting your gut. Statistically, children with multiple stable adult relationships are at lower risk for abuse, not higher, because predators rely on isolation. But the parent's caution is not paranoid; it is appropriate. Choose well, watch, talk to your child about consent and bodies, and do not delegate vigilance.

Workplaces. Schools. Religious communities. Neighborhoods. Each is a site where alloparents can be cultivated or blocked. Long working hours, frequent relocations, intensive academic schedules that fill children's lives with structured activities and leave no unstructured time with the family friend — these are systemic forces that erode the alloparent network. Conscious resistance is required. Sometimes the alloparent question forces a job decision, a housing decision, a school decision. The questions compound.

The alloparent is not an add-on. They are the missing infrastructure. With them, the parent can be a person; without them, the parent becomes a service provider. With them, the child becomes a citizen of a small community; without them, the child becomes the project of a household. The presence of other adults transforms the parental role from sole proprietor to general contractor — coordinating a small team of people who all love this child differently and adequately.

The adults who know your child now will be the adults at the funeral when you die. Your child, as an adult, will inherit not just your absence but the continued presence of the people who loved them alongside you. This is a real form of immortality — not your influence persisting through your child alone, but a small community of people who knew your child as a child, carrying forward into your child's adult life the felt sense of having been seen, valued, and held by many. It is also, in a thinning society, one of the most consequential micro-investments you can make: building human relationships that outlast you.

Ainsworth, Mary D. S., Mary C. Blehar, Everett Waters, and Sally Wall. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978.

Bowlby, John. A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. New York: Basic Books, 1988.

Brown, Brené. Daring Greatly: How the Courage to Be Vulnerable Transforms the Way We Live, Love, Parent, and Lead. New York: Gotham Books, 2012.

Fosha, Diana. The Transforming Power of Affect: A Model for Accelerated Change. New York: Basic Books, 2000.

Gottlieb, Lori. Maybe You Should Talk to Someone: A Therapist, Her Therapist, and Our Lives Revealed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2019.

Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer. Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2009.

Johnson, Sue. Hold Me Tight: Seven Conversations for a Lifetime of Love. New York: Little, Brown, 2008.

Main, Mary, Erik Hesse, and Nancy Kaplan. "Predictability of Attachment Behavior and Representational Processes at 1, 6, and 19 Years of Age." In Attachment from Infancy to Adulthood, edited by Klaus E. Grossmann, Karin Grossmann, and Everett Waters, 245–304. New York: Guilford Press, 2005.

Murthy, Vivek H. Together: The Healing Power of Human Connection in a Sometimes Lonely World. New York: Harper Wave, 2020.

Neff, Kristin. Self-Compassion: The Proven Power of Being Kind to Yourself. New York: William Morrow, 2011.

Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000.

Siegel, Daniel J., and Mary Hartzell. Parenting from the Inside Out: How a Deeper Self-Understanding Can Help You Raise Children Who Thrive. New York: TarcherPerigee, 2003.