The fantasy of who they could 'become
· 10 min read
The forecast is not the person
The fantasy operates by a kind of optical trick. Your partner walks into the room, and what you see is a layered image — them, plus the version of them you have been mentally rehearsing for years. You react not to what they say but to the gap between what they said and what the future version would have said. They feel the gap before they understand it. They start to feel, vaguely, that they are disappointing someone, but they can't locate the standard. They become defensive, then withdrawn, then quietly furious, and you think this confirms your forecast: see, they really do need to change. What it actually confirms is that nobody can stand being measured against an invisible ruler.Why we prefer the forecast
The forecast is safer than the person. The forecast cannot reject you, because it is yours. It cannot surprise you in ways you didn't sanction. It cannot have its own desires that contradict yours. Loving a forecast is loving a version of the other that is fully under your control, which is to say, it isn't really loving another person at all — it is loving an extension of your own preferences. This is why people who are most committed to their partner's "potential" are often the most threatened when that partner changes in a direction the forecast didn't include. Growth toward your script is welcome; growth in any other direction is betrayal.The contempt under the patience
Patience can be a form of contempt. The patient partner says, with their face and their tone and the small sighs that escape during ordinary conversations, "I am waiting for you to be better." They may think they are being generous. The waiting is the message. To be waited on, in this way, for years, is to be told every day that your current self is insufficient. Many people endure this for a long time before they understand why they feel constantly tired in their own home. The exhaustion is not the marriage. The exhaustion is being adjacent to someone's quiet, patient disappointment.How the fantasy gets installed
The fantasy is rarely invented from scratch. It is installed early, often in courtship, when the new partner shows you a slice of themselves at their best — energized, attentive, in a particular life moment — and you take that slice as the trailer for the full film. When the rest of the film turns out to be ordinary, you don't update; you assume the trailer is the real them and the rest is a temporary detour. Decades can go by inside this assumption. The "real them" you are waiting for is often a brief, atypical version that was a function of circumstance, not character. You have made a permanent commitment to a transient state.Acceptance is not approval
The antidote to the fantasy is acceptance, which is a much-abused word. Acceptance does not mean approval. It does not mean you like everything. It does not mean you stop having preferences. It means you stop treating the other person as a project. You can accept that your partner is, say, conflict-avoidant, and still ask them clearly for what you need. The difference is that the request comes from a place of "this is who you are and I'm asking anyway" rather than "if you loved me, you would already have stopped being who you are." The first is intimate. The second is war by other means.What actually changes people
People do change. They change slowly, in the presence of safety, when they want to, and almost never on someone else's timeline. The conditions for change are almost the opposite of the conditions the fantasy creates. The fantasy creates pressure, surveillance, and the constant low signal of insufficiency. Real change requires the felt sense of being seen as enough, and from that ground, an internally chosen direction. The deepest paradox of partnership is that the partner who is fully accepted is the partner most likely to grow, and the partner who is constantly being grown into is the partner most likely to calcify in defense.The ledger
Couples in the grip of the fantasy run a quiet ledger. The ledger tracks the gap. Every concession the partner makes is logged as a partial payment toward the imagined future self. Every regression is logged as a default. Over time the ledger becomes more vivid in the head of the ledger-keeper than the partner themselves. You start to relate to the ledger rather than to the person. The ledger has no warmth. It has no smell or laugh or specific way of holding a coffee cup. You have been having a marriage with your own bookkeeping.The grief you've been avoiding
Underneath the fantasy is a grief you have not let yourself feel. The grief is for the partner you imagined and did not get. The grief is for the marriage that was promised by the trailer and not delivered by the film. This grief is real and it deserves to be felt, and the reason you have not felt it is that feeling it would force a decision. So instead you have spread the grief out, thinly, over years, as a low background dissatisfaction. Letting yourself grieve the fantasy is not the end of the marriage. It is often the beginning of the marriage you actually have.Distinguishing fantasy from request
A legitimate request and a fantasy can look similar from the outside. The test is what happens when the request is refused. If your partner cannot give you what you are asking for, and your response is to keep asking in different forms, year after year, while quietly building a case — that is fantasy. If your partner cannot give you what you are asking for, and your response is to update your understanding of who they are and decide accordingly — that is reality. Requests have endpoints. Fantasies do not. They renew themselves indefinitely on the hope of a different answer next time.The mirror
The most uncomfortable move is to ask what fantasy your partner is holding about you. They have one. Everyone does. Somewhere in them is a version of you they have been waiting for — calmer, more affectionate, more ambitious, less ambitious, more or less of something. When you can see that you are also being held against an invisible standard, two things happen. You feel a small, surprising compassion for how it feels to be on the receiving end. And you begin to suspect that the whole architecture of mutual editing is the problem, not which edits are correct.The conversation
At some point the fantasy has to be named out loud, and this is harder than it sounds. The conversation is not "here is everything I have been silently wanting you to become." That conversation is an ambush. The conversation is closer to "I notice I have been waiting. I want to stop waiting. I want to see you, and I want you to see me, without the waiting." This is not a demand or a confession. It is an offer. Some partners will receive it as relief. Some will not know what to do with it. Either response is information.What you get back
When the fantasy is set down, something unexpected happens. The partner in front of you becomes visible again — not as a draft, but as a finished, specific human being with particular textures and limits and gifts. You may find that you love them more, not less. You may also find that you do not, and that the fantasy was the only thing holding you in. Both are honest. Both are better than the deferral. The point of releasing the fantasy is not to save the relationship. The point is to be in a real one — with this person, or eventually, with someone else, but never again with a forecast.Citations
1. Hendrix, Harville. Getting the Love You Want: A Guide for Couples. New York: Henry Holt, 1988. 2. Perel, Esther. Mating in Captivity: Unlocking Erotic Intelligence. New York: Harper, 2006. 3. Tatkin, Stan. Wired for Love: How Understanding Your Partner's Brain and Attachment Style Can Help You Defuse Conflict and Build a Secure Relationship. Oakland: New Harbinger, 2011. 4. Schnarch, David. Passionate Marriage: Keeping Love and Intimacy Alive in Committed Relationships. New York: Norton, 1997. 5. Johnson, Sue. Hold Me Tight: Seven Conversations for a Lifetime of Love. New York: Little, Brown, 2008. 6. Rogers, Carl R. On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of Psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1961. 7. Brown, Brené. Daring Greatly: How the Courage to Be Vulnerable Transforms the Way We Live, Love, Parent, and Lead. New York: Gotham, 2012. 8. hooks, bell. All About Love: New Visions. New York: William Morrow, 2000. 9. Rosenberg, Marshall B. Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life. Encinitas: PuddleDancer Press, 2003. 10. Phillips, Adam. Missing Out: In Praise of the Unlived Life. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012. 11. Brach, Tara. Radical Acceptance: Embracing Your Life with the Heart of a Buddha. New York: Bantam, 2003. 12. Chödrön, Pema. When Things Fall Apart: Heart Advice for Difficult Times. Boston: Shambhala, 1997.
◆
Cite this:
Comments
·
Sign in to join the conversation.
Be the first to share how this landed.